Lourenço da Silva Mendonça Chair:
critique of colonial formation, reparation and anti-racism
Lourenço da Silva Mendonça Chair:
critique of colonial formation, reparation and anti-racism
The creation of the Lourenço da Silva Mendonça Chair: critique of colonial education, reparation, and anti-racism aims to carry out teaching, research, and outreach activities focused on promoting a multifaceted and contemporary understanding of slavery and colonialism as modern-capitalist projects, whose dehumanization and implementation of monocultures still profoundly affect humanity, all living beings, and planet Earth.
To better understand and value the cosmologies and knowledge lost or subordinated throughout the implementation of this hierarchical and oppressive world system, the Chair will act in a transnational, multi-epistemological, and multidisciplinary manner, as well as in close dialogue with civil society, associations, institutions, and entities with similar agendas, promoting greater articulation between academic theory and artistic, sociopolitical, and community practices.
The main objective of this Chair is to participate in the reflection on colonial formation and actively seek ethical, economic, educational, sociopolitical, cultural, and legal redress for the damage and trauma it has caused. For all these reasons, the Chair considers itself anti-racist.
Who was Lourenço da Silva Mendonça?
Lourenço da Silva Mendonça was an attorney general for the Brotherhoods of Black Men (of Lisbon, Madrid, and thus of Spain and Portugal and their colonies) who acted against the enslavement of Christianized Africans and their descendants in the 17th century, participating in an abolitionist legal debate held between 1682 and 1686 at the Roman Curia.
In fact, two groups stood out in this struggle which, although linked to the Church, presented complementary positions and were therefore analyzed jointly by the Curia:
the Capuchin missionaries Francisco José de Jaca and Epifanio de Moirans, together with the attorney general of the Order, Giambattista Carampelli de Sabbio;
the Attorney General of the Brotherhoods of Black Men of Lisbon and Madrid, Lourenço da Silva Mendonça, representing the brotherhoods of Brazil, Portugal, Spain, and the rest of the Christian world.
Jaca and Moirans, missionaries from Spain and France, respectively, worked in the Caribbean—especially in Cuba and Venezuela. Mendonça, in turn, must have been born in the Kingdom of Ndongo and Matamba, reduced at that time to Mpungo-a-Ndongo, after the invasion and creation of the Kingdom of Angola by the Portuguese Crown.
His grandfather allied himself with Portugal, becoming a vassal and rising to power by usurping the regency of Queen Njinga Mbandi, who had been elected sovereign by the council. As a result of this process, Njinga came to rule only the Kingdom of Matamba.
The Capuchin missionaries and the attorney general who advocated abolition and reparations—long before nineteenth-century abolitionism and contemporary discussions about reparations—were part of an internal movement within the Catholic Church that denounced both slavery and the sinful behavior of Christians involved in the slave trade.
It is important to remember that modern slavery received legal justification in Europe from Roman law, which established the legal fiction that people could be treated as things and, as such, absolute power could be exercised over them.
Mendonça was descended from the Mundongo nobility who, after breaking with the Portuguese, resisted submission and enslavement. By that time, the Portuguese had already conquered almost the entire territory of the Kingdom of Angola. When vassalage was rejected, albeit belatedly, Mpungo-a-Ndongo was attacked, King Ari II, his uncle, was executed, and the kingdom was destroyed in 1671. The two Capuchin missionaries preached against slavery and the corruption of large landowners in Cuba. From 1681 onwards, they produced texts denouncing the illegality of slavery from legal and theological points of view, refuting the arguments used throughout colonization to justify the slave trade and explicitly advocating liberation and reparation.
Jaca drafted the Resolución sobre la libertad de los negros y sus originarios (Resolution on the Freedom of Blacks and Their Ancestors) (1681), while Moirans wrote Servi liberi seu naturalis mancipiorum libertatis iusta defensio (Just Defense of the Freedom of Slaves and Their Natural Mancipi) (1682).
Between 1682 and 1686, both the missionaries and Mendonça submitted documents—petitions and formal complaints—to Pope Innocent XI, demanding justice and reporting the abuses and brutality of the slave trade and slavery. Thecomplaints included arguments and detailed descriptions of the illegality of the processes of capture and enslavement, addressing topics such as “just war,” “capital crimes,” and “forced conversion to Christianity.” The so-called “titles” of enslavement—that is, the supposed legality of acquiring a human being—were vigorously contested by both Jaca and Moirans.
Moirans developed the most systematic argument about the illegality of trafficking and slavery in light of divine natural law, positive law, the law of nations, canon law, and civil law. Mendonça, in turn, maintained—in his capacity as attorney general of the Brotherhoods of Black Men—that the vast majority of enslaved people had already been baptized.
It is worth remembering that these baptisms took place both coercively, in collective ceremonies, and as a survival strategy, either to escape slavery, to organize, to fight for freedom, or to ensure a dignified burial. This fact alone, according to Mendonça, would be enough to make slavery totally illegal under the canon law of the Catholic Church.
In addition to denouncing the illegality of slavery, Jaca, Moirans, and Mendonça described and condemned the extreme violence, profound cruelty, and brutality that permeated both the slave trade and the slave regime. All of them also demanded compensation for the damage caused to the enslaved.
In this regard, Jaca and Moirans drafted a memorandum with 11 propositions that summarized the illegality of slavery, the need to free the enslaved, and the obligation to repair the damage. The document was initially presented, through the attorney general of the Capuchins, to Propaganda Fide and, later, on March 12, 1685, to the Holy Office and the pope. On March 20, 1686, the Holy Office approved the propositions, confirming the illegality of slavery and recognizing the need for liberation and reparation.
DIRTY GOSSIP – misconceptions of Africa and the slave history: Njinga, Queen of Angola (2013). By Carolin Overhoff Ferreira
This bilingual book offers a critical study of the Western historiography on Queen Njinga from a ground-breaking perspective. Queen Njinga was one of Africa’s most important political leaders in the 17th century of the Ndongo and Matamba kingdoms. She fought all her life to halt the Portuguese invasion, conquest and colonization of what is today Angola, and, most importantly, the slave trade. Angola produced a film on her life, Njinga, Queen of Angola, in 2013, as its first high-budget and exclusively national production, choosing a Portuguese filmmaker to direct it. The book argues that the film is based on superficial and stereotyped misconceptions of Africa and the history of slavery, passing on most of the dirty gossip from Western historiography. It analyzes the falsification of the Ndogno and Matamba kingdoms' political organization, the omission of slavery, the trivialization of the conflict with the Portuguese invaders, the obfuscation of Njinga’s leadership and her successful resistance against the violence and brutality of invasion and enslavement.
Available here: https://www.amazon.com.br/DIRTY-GOSSIP-misconceptions-equivocadas-escravatura-ebook/dp/B0F5SSB981/ref=sr_1_10?dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.nWG-5m--6tefyL0XyW-VMkS3B8hZp1cLR-g2biSfahdFcJa69WmcJqXRySRSPckqRUYNDVkEl3MtLSQOnYaK9rYFynmT6MsKZgLlGm8bWsrOT5TOnJWS3OFx8BxBWmBq5bQeCUR3h-x4MKHmXhS1Ed8n09n2aRTs_CFYEupYYS8.82Dvjj2aCWoeYixD_E-vvGAMTdtzQTmuG604OQzVuWU&dib_tag=se&qid=1745498556&refinements=p_27%3ACarolin+Overhoff+Ferreira&s=books&sr=1-10
Seminar: "The proof that demands a verdict: The case of the African abolitionist Lourenço da Silva Mendonça in the Atlantic and the Vatican's response in the 17th century”. Read more...
Partnerships